First to Five
JusticeStephen G. Breyer

Stephen G. Breyer

In October Term 2014, a single noisy term, Breyer voted with the majority in 86% of divided cases and 90% of all cases. The comparison is the other justices on that bench.

86% in the majority, divided cases this term, noisy
90% in the majority, all cases this term, noisy
9 majority opinions this term
-1.20 Martin-Quinn, this term relative to the docket

Ideology over time

-20+2+41994199520002005201020152017BreyerCONSERVATIVELIBERAL

Martin-Quinn score by term against the Court median. Negative is liberal. Scores are relative to the docket. Intervals are not in this file. A single term is noisy.

Download the rows (CSV)

Table
seriestermmartin_quinn
Breyer1994-0.506
Breyer1995-0.741
Breyer1996-0.991
Breyer1997-1.067
Breyer1998-1.058
Breyer1999-1.049
Breyer2000-1.412
Breyer2001-1.426
Breyer2002-1.398
Breyer2003-1.312
Breyer2004-1.198
Breyer2005-1.419
Breyer2006-1.509
Breyer2007-1.399
Breyer2008-1.176
Breyer2009-1.271
Breyer2010-1.318
Breyer2011-1.272
Breyer2012-1.213
Breyer2013-1.203
Breyer2014-1.200
Breyer2017-1.675
Court median19940.663
Court median19950.573
Court median19960.692
Court median19970.636
Court median19980.737
Court median19990.724
Court median20000.480
Court median20010.302
Court median20020.220
Court median20030.169
Court median20040.076
Court median20050.189
Court median20060.413
Court median20070.317
Court median20080.565
Court median20090.572
Court median20100.679
Court median20110.436
Court median2012-0.373
Court median20130.465
Court median20140.470
Court median2017-0.590

Where Breyer came down, by issue

0%25%50%75%100%Federal TaxationDue ProcessUnionsFederalismCivil RightsCriminal ProcedureFirst AmendmentEconomic ActivityJudicial Power

Share of votes coded liberal. The first-run issue table suppresses cells under 25 votes and does not publish a separate Court rate for this justice. Direction before 1946 is excluded.

Download the rows (CSV)

Table
issuejustice_liberalcourt_liberaln
Federal Taxation0.7711704
Due Process0.7301704
Unions0.7301704
Federalism0.6601704
Civil Rights0.6291704
Criminal Procedure0.5441704
First Amendment0.5151704
Economic Activity0.5051704
Judicial Power0.4941704

At oral argument stage 3

Words per argument, questions to each side, interruptions given and received, and whether the side questioned more went on to lose. Formats are never pooled.

Source: Oyez speaker turns

Writing style stage 2

Words per opinion, reading grade, citations per thousand words, and the share of case versus statutory citations.

Source: CourtListener opinion text

Reasoning profile stage 6

Which reasoning techniques appear, against the Court average over the same terms. Validation accuracy prints beside the chart.

Source: Taxonomy classifier over opinion text

Before the Court stage 8

Pre-appointment opinions, reversal record and panel agreement.

Source: CourtListener, labeled by coverage

IIIAn email address is all an alert needs

An email address is the only required field. There is no account.